My first sig using the name "Griever"

Griever

Griever

Chocobo Breeder
Joined
Jul 29, 2006
Messages
10
Gil
0
soulreaversig2.jpg


How is it?
 
The render blends well, but too well. I think you only lightened the opacity. That or you feathered it way too much. Some distinction is better than none imo. As for the words. Can't read them, or should I say it. I can read it, but its hard to see. Try to add a 1 pixel stroke aorund it, most likely black would work best for this sig.

I'm a fan of boarders...and you do have a top and bottom line boarder which is a job well done. Simplicity generally makes the best boarders. But I think it may help to add maybe a 1pixel line along the sides too. Maybe a white one that has a soft light effect, maybe a black line. Not too sure what to say on that since I'd have to play with it personally to tell you. Mayhaps that IS the best in boarder choice, but just giving suggustions.

Background does not seem bad at all. As for the actual render, I can't tell due to the fact I cant see the edges. Thus I cannot say if it is well renderd or not.

Note: I can quite literally find everything wrong with a sig and at times can be harsh. Don't take it personally its just how I critisize.
 
Nightwolf said:
The render blends well, but too well. I think you only lightened the opacity. That or you feathered it way too much. Some distinction is better than none imo. As for the words. Can't read them, or should I say it. I can read it, but its hard to see. Try to add a 1 pixel stroke aorund it, most likely black would work best for this sig.

I'm a fan of boarders...and you do have a top and bottom line boarder which is a job well done. Simplicity generally makes the best boarders. But I think it may help to add maybe a 1pixel line along the sides too. Maybe a white one that has a soft light effect, maybe a black line. Not too sure what to say on that since I'd have to play with it personally to tell you. Mayhaps that IS the best in boarder choice, but just giving suggustions.

Background does not seem bad at all. As for the actual render, I can't tell due to the fact I cant see the edges. Thus I cannot say if it is well renderd or not.

Note: I can quite literally find everything wrong with a sig and at times can be harsh. Don't take it personally its just how I critisize.
Click to expand...
How come its bad that its too blended? you said you cant see the edges of the stock.. its because I used alot of blending towards it. Yes I do agree though on some stuff ya sid
 
Its not that its well blended, its that it seems like I can see the background easily through the stock. See well blended is good, being able to somewhat see the the background through the stock imo isnt. I like some distinction. Of course differant people will say differant things on this aspect, so really its probally not a huge deal :)
 
^ Ahh, I now see what your saying. Yes I did over do the soft brushes on the side.. the whole blending after that is supposed to fix it. but I guess ti flubbed up.
 
It happens :p

I personally don't blend my images in at all over 75% of the time, and thus I don't run into that kinda a problem. On the other hand when I look back at stuff I make I constantly see some blending errors with colors and the such :\
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top