I actually have experienced what I consider to be love in the distant past, and it left me heartbroken.
However the reason why it left me heartbroken, is because I believed that love existed in the first place. I now think that love cannot (really) be defined, but is a mix of emotions which has...
That's not eternal to love someone if they die, though. You die and it's all over with.
Using this example will simply be even harder to do, because you'll have to argue points which are quite difficult to prove.
What, then, is love by that definition?
For example, what is the source of love? If love exists, but is different to everyone, surely it has a source? Otherwise, how can we say that this "different for everyone" thing is really love? This was covered by 4). in my argument when I said that if...
Not necessarily. The problem is, if love exists and is eternal/forever, that means the statement "nothing lasts forever" is false instead.
While your argument tries to support mine, you need to say why "nothing" outweighs "love". Or are you simply agreeing with me that you cannot define love?
Are you sure you want to take this argument? That logic can be used to argue that God exists or doesn't exist, etc. Emotions don't need a special case.
Which doesn't disprove anything [that] I think.
1). Nobody can define love. Semantics can't even do it, when you think about it, because one definition relies on another and so one...
2). If you cannot define it, you don't know what it is.
3). Then when one speaks of love, they don't know what they're talking about.
4). So, love may or may...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.