I think people have mistaken literacy as the only real criterion, I'd imagine Shu assumed we are all competent in reading and writing
I find it odd that almost none of the members have rated themselves at five or lower, five is the average so it seems bizarre that so many are above the norm. After all if everyone was above the average then it would not longer be the average, ohohoho etc.
I am a five, my writing is comprehensible and contains trace elements of independent thought, personality, and what I hope passes as humour
If a 10/10 is a perfect score, does that mean most people are placing themselves in league with Wilde, Joyce, Huxley, Card, and King?
I find it odd that almost none of the members have rated themselves at five or lower, five is the average so it seems bizarre that so many are above the norm. After all if everyone was above the average then it would not longer be the average, ohohoho etc.
I am a five, my writing is comprehensible and contains trace elements of independent thought, personality, and what I hope passes as humour
If a 10/10 is a perfect score, does that mean most people are placing themselves in league with Wilde, Joyce, Huxley, Card, and King?