The_Oathkeeper
Why so serious?
@VengefulRonin:
In any case, as I said earlier, I would also love some oldschool Final Fantasy bosses in Kingdom Hearts, but...I wouldn't want a repeat of Setzer, either.
And before you say anything, I realize that this is fantasy and doesn't have to follow all of our rules. However, for as long as there has been fiction, authors and video-game designers alike have been trying to replicate human behavior for sake of creating realistic characters that the player can relate to. Why, then, would we want to take a step backwards and revert back to creating 2-Dimensional villains with next to no motivation?
See, that's what separates Sephiroth from Kefka. Kefka is just a psycho for no good reason. Square really took the easy way out with him, and he came out like they intended: a shallow, 2-Dimensional character with absolutely nothing unique about him. Hell, his most memorable quality is his evil laugh. How cliche is that? Sephiroth is a psycho with an actual reason to be a psycho. He's not the most realistic character I've ever seen. Far from it, in fact, but you have to remember, this was 1997. RPG's were still evolving, so naturally, they're not going to get it spot-on their first try.
@L:
Well...true as that statement is, my point is that Nomura really didn't want to include Setzer. And, given how poorly Setzer's character was handled in KH2, I see his point.
So I couldn't agree more with you there.
I'm sorry, but...Kefka is quite cliche. He's definitely a great villain and was a lot of fun to watch, but there's...really nothing very unique about him. Again, it's not that I don't like Kefka, I just think that he's almost as overrated as Sephiroth himself.
You misunderstood me, VengefulRonin. I wasn't referring to his character designs/the appearances of the characters. I was referring to the personalities of the characters involved. Setzer was quite out of character and was given a small role in the game primarily because Nomura didn't think he'd be able to do him justice. And...well...he couldn't. Would I like to have more oldschool Final Fantasy characters in Kingdom Hearts? Of course. Cecil Harvey and Kain, Golbez, Terra, Locke, Bartz, even Firion would be a refreshing change of pace to me. The problem is Nomura just can't pull it off, and he knows it.HA! Say what? He didn't want to include them because they weren't his designs...and if ANYONE here says "well it's hard to translate Amano characters into videogames", NO, it's not. Look at the FFs on the DS. Nomura COULD have easily done that. But no, he decided to make Setzer some piece of shit anime character with bad clothes.
Admittedly, you're right. It would be pretty funny, but...impossible, given the game's rating. I'd like it if people were more tolerant of swearing in video-games, but...alas, that's not going to happen anytime soon. So, while I'd like it if Cid could be kept in-character, it's virtually impossible considering the number of soccer moms who are outside Square-Enix HQ in their mini-vans, just waiting for the chance to complain about the Kingdom Hearts series.It would be pretty funny though. I actually kinda liked Cid's character, he was a nice counterpoint to Merlin.
Nomura used to be quite talented. His anime-like style was a unique change of pace for the Final Fantasy series at the time. Cloud Strife and Sephiroth were, believe it or not, actually interesting characters at the time of their original conception. Recently, though? Yes, I agree that Nomura is losing his touch. Again, my complaints primarily have to do with the Final Fantasy 7 Compilation. As far as Crisis Core, Dirge of Cirberus, and Advent Children are concerned, you're absolutely right. All of the characters look more like J-Rock stars than RPG characters.I'd rather ask for a talented artist. You know, someone who doesn't just draw the same lackluster characters over and over and change their clothes a little bit and give them different names so we can tell which is which.
I never said that it was easy to beat Sephiroth early on in the game, I said that it was possible. You were complaining about how you have to have this big, climactic battle with Sephiroth at the end of the game, whereas you really don't have to fight him at all if you don't want to. And even if you do fight him, it's not required that you wait until near the end of the game. Hell, Sephiroth has been beaten on Level 1 in Critical Mode.That's what I did, and he beat my ass. Granted, I didn't have the superglide ability so that probably hampered my chances, but whatever. It would have been nice to see some other awesome bosses though, instead of just Sephi and the Coliseum (which, btw, was utter crap in KH2).
In any case, as I said earlier, I would also love some oldschool Final Fantasy bosses in Kingdom Hearts, but...I wouldn't want a repeat of Setzer, either.
lrn2english. No offense or anything, but that sentence is grammatically correct. I really don't know what you were getting at there...See the bolded text in your quote? That's where it makes no grammatical sense.
Yes, but that's basically the worst motivation a villain can have. By your logic, all villains should revert back to the way they were in the 1920's, constantly shouting out "I'LL GET YOU IF IT'S THE LAST THING I DO!" as they adjust their monocles and stroke their mustaches. I'm sorry, but in this day and age, villains need to have decent motivations that make them at least somewhat believable as characters. In real life, nobody is evil for no good reason (and no, "Because it's fun!" isn't a good motivation). Even psychopaths are able to justify their actions in some way. Kefka, however, is just evil, which makes no sense by any logic (except, perhaps, fanboy logic).You see the italicized text in your quote? That's where you're wrong. Kefka DID kill people for a reason and he DID have motivation: he LIKED it. It was FUN for him. It gave him pleasure to see people suffer and to kill them. That's why he is a better villain, he is purely psychotic and evil.
And before you say anything, I realize that this is fantasy and doesn't have to follow all of our rules. However, for as long as there has been fiction, authors and video-game designers alike have been trying to replicate human behavior for sake of creating realistic characters that the player can relate to. Why, then, would we want to take a step backwards and revert back to creating 2-Dimensional villains with next to no motivation?
Sephiroth found out that he was a monster in a very literal sense of the word. You seem to be under the impression that superpowers make everything better, which is just not true. The fact that Sephiroth was a "1337 warrior" doesn't make up for the fact that he was, in fact, a monster who was created for the explicit purpose of killing people for Shin-Ra. You have to remember that Sephiroth wasn't in his right mind, and rightfully so. Given the circumstances, any normal person would not have thought it was "KICKASS!" They would be having a serious identity crisis that would probably lead them into insanity...kinda like what happened to Sephiroth.Sephiroth is a moron. So he finds out he was a "monster" because he had Jenova cells along with mako in him. Hmm, well lets see, for being a "monster" he still turned out to be a 1337 warrior with looks to kill. So he's really quite the pussy for throwing a tantrum over it. Any normal person would be like "hmm...so mom and dad experimented on me...and now I'm the strongest person on the planet...KICKASS!" and then go about exploiting it, not throw a tantrum.
See, that's what separates Sephiroth from Kefka. Kefka is just a psycho for no good reason. Square really took the easy way out with him, and he came out like they intended: a shallow, 2-Dimensional character with absolutely nothing unique about him. Hell, his most memorable quality is his evil laugh. How cliche is that? Sephiroth is a psycho with an actual reason to be a psycho. He's not the most realistic character I've ever seen. Far from it, in fact, but you have to remember, this was 1997. RPG's were still evolving, so naturally, they're not going to get it spot-on their first try.
Yes, but it's a terrible motivation. I can't count the number of times I've seen a villain who is evil "BECAUSE IT'S FUN! KEKEKEKEKE..." That's really all there is to him. How is Sephiroth cliche if Kefka isn't?And then right in the next sentence you state his motivation... *facepalm*
How, exactly, is Sephiroth a pussy? He may be emotionally unstable, but a pussy he most certainly is not. By the way, he only refers to Jenova as "Mother" once throughout the entire course of Final Fantasy 7 after the Nibelheim Incident. After his refreshing dip in the Lifestream, Sephiroth had come to recognize Jenova as nothing more than a means to an end. Oh, and Sephiroth no longer thinks he's a Cetra once the game begins.Sephiroth wasn't evil, he was an emotionally unstable pussy who babbled on about his "mommy" and the promised land. Yeah, the little twit didn't even finish reading the research. He finds one little bit saying he has Jenova cells and all of a sudden thinks he's a descendant? Pfft, no, he was the son of two HUMANS and just happened to be their guinea pig. Sephiroth sucks.
Almighty? Hardly. It's a lot easier to make a list of things Sephiroth has done than it is to make a list of things Kefka has done. Yes, Kefka's scheme eventually resulted in the creation of the World of Ruin, but he didn't do it through his own power. That was the power of the three statues you saw.Blah blah blah, are you still going on about the almighty Sephiroth? I could give you a list of things about Kefka, but I think just stating one of them will do:
Maybe not, but that doesn't mean that he isn't tougher than Kefka. Hell, look at Kingdom Hearts 1. Sora isn't a god, but he was still able to beat Hades, who most certainly is a god. Hell, Sora beat the Rock Titan. The Titans are, according to Greek mythology, stronger than the gods. So I really don't see how that's relevant.Kefka became a god. Can your omnipotent Sephiroth boast that? No.
That's your argument? "You're an FF7 Fanboy?" Nice try, but no. Final Fantasy 7 isn't my favorite RPG, nor is it even my favorite Final Fantasy game. That award goes to Final Fantasy IX. FF7 is tied for second place with (gasp and shock) Final Fantasy 6. By the way, if you'd actually paid attention to my post, you'd see that I don't like how Sephiroth was portrayed in the FF7 Compilation. If I were a blind fanboy, why would I openly admit to disliking his character in recent titles? Take it to the VI Section.And you're only saying VII haters are FAR more annoying than VII fanboys because...um...you're a fanboy? That's nice. We don't care how much you love VII and Sephiroth. Take it to the VII section, or ACF.
Yeah, that's true...Though, from what I've seen, Critical Mode on FM+ is much better. In fact, I've heard that it's actually quite challenging. I'll have to get my hands on it to see if it really is any good.Agreed. Just swing the keyblade a billion times. Cure once per battle. Maybe. Because usually Donald and Goofy will heal you. And what happens in boss battles? Donald and Goofy get KOed because their AI sucks. Then if you're low on health and MP, you run around the boss in circles dodging their attacks waiting for Donald or Goofy to revive so they can heal you and you can go back to kicking the boss's ass.
I defended Sephiroth, Cloud, Aerith, Cid, and (to some extent, though I hate the man's recent work) Tetsuya Nomura. And I never said you hated VII. Cloud and Sephiroth hate, however, generally counts as FF7 Hate. In any case, I, too, believe that the two of them have been entirely too whored. I never denied that. With such titles as Advent Children and Crisis Core, Square-Enix has milked the two of them for all they're worth. However, in the original FF7, they were very good characters. Kingdom Hearts 2 isn't the problem here. The problem is the FF7 Compilation.All I saw you defending was Sephiroth and Cloud, not even the game as a whole. Plus, nobody here even said they hated VII, Cloud and Sephiroth are just generic-looking characters and have become entirely too whored out by now.
@L:
Could've been better to throw out a few more terms, such as development teams, retards/fanboys/fangirls, etc., but i really couldn't be arsed, see.
Well...true as that statement is, my point is that Nomura really didn't want to include Setzer. And, given how poorly Setzer's character was handled in KH2, I see his point.
Again, ordinarily, I'd agree with you. However, you have to realize that this isn't the Aerith from Final Fantasy 7, nor is it the Squall from Final Fantasy 8. Kingdom Hearts operates under the assumption that all Final Fantasy cameos are nothing more than "Alternate Universe" versions of their original self. In other words, Aerith never died, and, within the context of the Kingdom Hearts universe, Rinoa never did exist (as far as we know).Usually when a character dies, they don't get to walk around and flirt with characters from other game series, y'know.
The problem with her warming up to Squall, is that it destroys part of his character, even if it sucks anyway. But nonetheless, it destroys a part of his character because it's as if Rinoa never even existed. That's a huge point in his history, you know. She was really the motivation for him to complete the story of Final Fantasy VIII, and it's wrong to see that hooker just shove something like that away like it never happened.
Point taken. Cid really wasn't a PG character, so...I don't know why Square chose him over someone like Shera or perhaps Vincent Valentine. Pretty much anyone else would have been much easier to incorporate into the game.Although that would be nice, no. Not really. I'd prefer they remove him from the game and replace him with his girlfriend. She'd make a much better character to be put in that position, seeing as she is a rated PG character.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLckypXfVmQNo, no the Sephiroth battle does not take five minutes when you're only level 47. I dare you to try it without using cheats or smashing your controller to pieces.
Then we're in agreement here. That's pretty much exactly how I feel on the subject. FF7, itself, is a damn good game. The FF7 Compilation, however, is a different story entirely. Yes, Sephiroth has been whored during the past couple of years, and yes, they really need to stop rehashing that "Walking into fire" scene. It was badass the first time, but after that? Ugh...I never stated that I hate FFVII. If you must know, I'm a hater of FFVII being whored out. The game was bloody good for the most part itself, but now it's nothing but a pile of rubble.
I'm sorry, which whored out villian appears in almost every game that's got Final Fantasy Cameos and almost always has those gay flames? Sephiroth. Last I ever saw Kefka, he was only in Final Fantasy VI.
So I couldn't agree more with you there.
can I lawlfacepalm nao? Also, it was more of a MWGWAHAHAHHAHAHA kind of thing.
I'm sorry, but...Kefka is quite cliche. He's definitely a great villain and was a lot of fun to watch, but there's...really nothing very unique about him. Again, it's not that I don't like Kefka, I just think that he's almost as overrated as Sephiroth himself.
Oh...right...Tactics Advance. I forgot about that little "gem." Anyway, FF6 and FF4 actually had some pretty damn good characters. Other than that? Well...you have to remember, this is the 8-Bit Era we're talking about here.True, true. Forgot that little factor, due to the fact shortly after the production of Final Fantasy VI, they ditched nintendo and grouped up with Sony.
But what I was referencing to were characters that are already shallow, and weren't the least bit interesting. Like Marche from Final Fantasy Tactics Advance, for example.
I'm sorry, but I really don't like it when people call Cloud and Squall emos. KH2 Cid and KH2 Aerith you pretty much have right, for the most part. KH2 Cloud and Squall, though? While it's an easy mistake to make, neither of them are really emos. It's a common misconception, though.Cloud is your emo guy, Cid is your soccer dad guy, Yuffie is your random hot chick lady, Aerith is your smelly french whore, Squall is your other emo guy... and so on.
Well...they're cameos because any other characters would have worked just as well in their places. If I took Cloud and Sephiroth out of the plot and replaced them with Dante and Vergil from DMC (submitting that idea to Square Enix), the subplot still would've worked. While the characters are part of the story, they're not a crucial part of the story. They're replaceable, in other words.The reason that I do not classify a lot them as Cameos is because they become a part of the game. Normally, a cameo is a character from another game that you fight against and then never see in the game again.
But the Final Fantasy characters are a part of Kingdom Hearts. If they were included in only one game, I think it would be necessary to call them cameos, but when they keep appearing in the game as important characters, they are a part of the story.
Last edited: