My bad, I must've missed your post.I did in my last post.
Or at least I attempted to.
To expand on it, who is to say that if the FFVII Hawaii, Texas and Korea exist that they will be the same as our planet's Hawaii, Texas and Korea?
Why would they be on the FFVII planet anyway?
If other games can have towns and locations which share names with Earth locations, yet are clearly not our locations, then wouldn't it be safer to conclude that if Hawaii, Texas and Korea were mentioned in anything other than a poster / flyer / billboard which only keenest players will notice, and were shown to be real places in the FFVII universe, that they would be different to our own?
Karnak in FFV looks nothing like Karnak at all, for example. It isn't Karnak, yet it is named Karnak.
Midgar takes its name from Midgard, yet it wouldn't make sense for the realm of Midgard to be limited to only Midgar city within the FFVII universe unless it was to be taken as an allusion or a metaphor relating to the power of mankind within it.
But, before, when we had exact things tied only to Christianity, you all said it wasn't enough, you said it needed to be named to prove it. But now you're saying it has to look like it to prove it's something. Well, the religious examples we've given are more than spot on and they're also named after Christian themes. So, since it looks like it and is named it, it's it right?