If no one can counter those quotes from the Qur'an, if no one can counter the statements made by Islamic groups, then my point is proven.
The problem is twofold.
1) No one could ever give you enough evidence to make you change your mind. Frankly, there's enough in this thread for that. If it hasn't happened by now, it's not going to happen.
2) Religious texts are open to interpretation. Two different people can look at the same words on the same page and come up with two wildly different versions of the same religion. That's why we have 48 million different denominations of Christianity, and probably an equal number of sects of Islam.
So. If a moderate Muslim says Islam is not a religion of hate and violence, are they correct? Yes. If a Muslim extremist uses Islam as a backdrop for hate and violence, are they correct? Yes. Because it's open to interpretation.
So when you take information and links from sites that agree with the extremist version of Islam, you show one side of the argument. Moreover, you put yourself on that side of the fence. There are, however, those of us who can differentiate between the denotation of the words in the Qur'an, and their practical application in the religion today. In Islam, they are the moderates. That is the version of Islam I agree with. If you agree with the terrorists, that's on you.