I think you're reading far too much into this.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
YESSSSSSSSSS JIM WAS BANNED TEE HEE,WOOO HOOO,FUCK HIM !I ALWAYS SAID I WANTED HIM TO BE BANNED,NOW IT HAPPENED ! YESSSSSSSS!
So more moaning about it = bigger punishment...
Dave said:Getting an infraction for ignoring a warning is fine, getting a warning for something that's not harmful or indeed against rules is stupid, so yes he was banned for something stupid
And no one's forcing anyone to stay around when Jim's taking the pissssssssssss
It's what you suggestedDon't put words in my mouth. That's not what I said.
And yours is that it's warranted, so who gets the last word?In your opinion.
Unless they wanted to, you know, do trivia.
It's what you suggested
Dave said:And yours is that it's warranted, so who gets the last word?
Dave said:I don't want people to post in this thread if they don't want to contribute to getting Jim unbanned. I'm offended and annoyed by people not inkeeping with this theme. I am enjoying this thread, as are most of the people who share my view. Can I have people infracted for posting in the thread and not wanting Jim unbanned? No I cannot because I nor you have the authority to stop people posting when rules aren't being broken.
Dave said:Just undo the silly infraction for the big text already, if you think it's guaranteed he'll land himself back in there then you have nothing to worry about and he'll end up nullifying the arguments I've made for him.
YESSSSSSSSSS JIM WAS BANNED TEE HEE,WOOO HOOO,FUCK HIM !I ALWAYS SAID I WANTED HIM TO BE BANNED,NOW IT HAPPENED ! YESSSSSSSS!
We're disputing the validity of the "rule" that was broken. Perhaps instead of trailing in at the tail end we should pay attention to the whole thread...Perhaps instead of complaining about being banned... he should learn to follow the rules. might help somewhere down the line.
And really didn't deserve the latest one. That was also quite a long time ago.He really shouldn't be complaining anyways, as he was supposedly on his "last warning" back when Mandi was still on staff.
No. :dave:Deal with it.
We're disputing the validity of the "rule" that was broken. Perhaps instead of trailing in at the tail end we should pay attention to the whole thread...
And really didn't deserve the latest one. That was also quite a long time ago.