This place is so...

Status
Not open for further replies.
So more moaning about it = bigger punishment...

Don't put words in my mouth. That's not what I said.

Dave said:
Getting an infraction for ignoring a warning is fine, getting a warning for something that's not harmful or indeed against rules is stupid, so yes he was banned for something stupid

In your opinion.

And no one's forcing anyone to stay around when Jim's taking the pissssssssssss

Unless they wanted to, you know, do trivia.
 
Don't put words in my mouth. That's not what I said.
It's what you suggested



In your opinion.
And yours is that it's warranted, so who gets the last word?



Unless they wanted to, you know, do trivia.

I don't want people to post in this thread if they don't want to contribute to getting Jim unbanned. I'm offended and annoyed by people not inkeeping with this theme. I am enjoying this thread, as are most of the people who share my view. Can I have people infracted for posting in the thread and not wanting Jim unbanned? No I cannot because I nor you have the authority to stop people posting when rules aren't being broken.

Just undo the silly infraction for the big text already, if you think it's guaranteed he'll land himself back in there then you have nothing to worry about and he'll end up nullifying the arguments I've made for him.
 
It's what you suggested

Not at all. Although, in a sense, you are correct. If multiple people complained about the same incident, it's more likely to receive an infraction.

Dave said:
And yours is that it's warranted, so who gets the last word?

Probably Ami, since she's the one who gave out the infraction.

Dave said:
I don't want people to post in this thread if they don't want to contribute to getting Jim unbanned. I'm offended and annoyed by people not inkeeping with this theme. I am enjoying this thread, as are most of the people who share my view. Can I have people infracted for posting in the thread and not wanting Jim unbanned? No I cannot because I nor you have the authority to stop people posting when rules aren't being broken.

So he didn't ignore Ami's warnings?

Dave said:
Just undo the silly infraction for the big text already, if you think it's guaranteed he'll land himself back in there then you have nothing to worry about and he'll end up nullifying the arguments I've made for him.

Even though I never actually said that, it's already happened once, at least. He weaseled his way out of the infraction I gave him for taking a shot at Vikki, which had him suspended. For the next few days after he got out, he took every possible opportunity to take shots at me in the SB. Very easily could have landed himself right back in.
 
Alright Alright.. serious discussions in the Spam section... sigh.

This will be the shortest post you get out of me.

It was decided that Jim will remained infracted on the grounds that he in fact did personally insult one of our moderators. The "text" problem wasn't the issue at hand, it was the fact that it was provoked further with crude personal insults, that were in fact seen as trolling.

When making a slight of joke, or taking the piss out of someone, you have to make sure they see it as sort as well. If we sat around and questioned eachother's judgments on a daily basis as staffers, we wouldn't get shit done. She made the right choice, but I understand if there was some confusion. If you have anything else to add, by all means, but you have to understand, most folks are only doing their job.
 
YESSSSSSSSSS JIM WAS BANNED TEE HEE,WOOO HOOO,FUCK HIM !I ALWAYS SAID I WANTED HIM TO BE BANNED,NOW IT HAPPENED ! YESSSSSSSS!

I'm just wondering if that guy got a warning to, that's all :monster:

Not my kinda thread.
 
Perhaps instead of complaining about being banned... he should learn to follow the rules. might help somewhere down the line.

He really shouldn't be complaining anyways, as he was supposedly on his "last warning" back when Mandi was still on staff. Deal with it. :monster:
 
Perhaps instead of complaining about being banned... he should learn to follow the rules. might help somewhere down the line.
We're disputing the validity of the "rule" that was broken. Perhaps instead of trailing in at the tail end we should pay attention to the whole thread...

He really shouldn't be complaining anyways, as he was supposedly on his "last warning" back when Mandi was still on staff.
And really didn't deserve the latest one. That was also quite a long time ago.


Deal with it. :monster:
No. :dave:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Six
This following post is not going to have a point. Why? 'Cause it's the fucking spam section and there's to be no fucking serious shit going one!!!

...Wait, "going one"? Fuckin' spelling!!! :rage:
 
We're disputing the validity of the "rule" that was broken. Perhaps instead of trailing in at the tail end we should pay attention to the whole thread...

I read the entire thread kthx

And really didn't deserve the latest one. That was also quite a long time ago.

He ignored a moderator's warning. Last I checked, that was against the rules.



In the end it comes down to the amount of times he's disobeyed the mods and broken the rules. He's obviously racked up enough to be banned for 6 months. As I said before, deal with it. Maybe in 6 months he'll have learned not to break the rules, but I seriously doubt that, so be prepared for him to get banned again. :monster:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top