Well the fact of the matter is whether you think it should be thought of as alive or not it is. You can't change fact with your opinion. It's a living organism.
I was a neglected child, and by neglected I mean from the ages of 10-19 I lived almost completely by myself without having a parent around for more then one night a week. After my parents got divorced and one of them got custody they basically abandoned me as if they had only gotten custody to hurt the other. They did not buy food for the house, and didn't know if I was passing or failing school or even if I advanced grades or not.
I can assure you that a neglected life is better then not existing. Are you more afraid of being neglected? Or are you more afraid of dying? As someone who suffered pretty severe neglect I promise you life is better.
The idea of forcing an abortion on someone is flat out DISGUSTING and completely reprehensible. I mean that's just fucking terrible. If flaming were allowed I'd flame the shit out of you for such an awful idea.
I really can't imagine any sane, intelligent human being who has actually stopped and pondered life's inner workings could ever come to the conclusion that an abortion should be forced because someone isn't financially capable of raising the child. In all honesty that's just stupid. Just plain stupid. There is plenty of financial aid and there are plenty of alternatives to the child growing up depraved.
"Fact" is nothing more than commonly held opinion. The "fact" of the matter, if you like such black-and-white thinking, is that unborn children do not have any legal rights until they leave the womb, so for all intents and purposes they AREN'T human beings. They don't matter. What DOES matter is whether they can be taken care of when they become a legal personality, and whether the mother actually wants the child in the first place.
And I can assure you that your opinion is NOT absolute, and that it depends entirely upon the circumstances and the individual as to whether not existing would be preferable. I am perhaps more pessimistic and cynical than you, because I was neglected as a child as well and I believe that it would be better not to exist than to go through what I went through. I imagine we're simply going to have to agree to disagree on that point, because you obviously place a higher value on life than I do (although that isn't saying much) and I doubt either of us will budge.
You would flame me if you were able simply because I do not agree with your opinion? How narrow-minded. You can't be particularly "pro-life" if you think it is acceptable for children to be abused and neglected, when this could have been avoided if they were not brought into the world in the first place. What sort of life is that? Children aren't toys to be tossed aside at the whim of the parent, they are supposed to be nurtured and cared for. If they are not going to be properly looked after, then they should be gotten rid of BEFORE they develop and become human beings with rights.
Well, excuse me for not complying with your opinions.
If these alternatives exist, then why are children still suffering in the world? If you perhaps stopped to think yourself, you would notice even with this support that the world isn't as rosy-pink as you would like to think it is. Even with these things available, children ARE "growing up depraved" and something needs to be done about it. The most logical answer is to avoid the entire issue in the first place. Hell knows this planet is overpopulated as is. I think it would be preferable to stop children from coming into the world in the first place. That does not make me either insane or stupid. It simply means I have an alternative perspective. Don't like it? Tough.
Last edited: